Friday, September 23, 2011

Harry Jaffe needs a reality check about cars on the road

Harry Jaffe writes a column in the Washington Examiner, and his articles frequently take unnecessary jabs at people who depend on automobiles in Washington, DC for transportation. He advocates a mandatory Car-free DC day in the following article, but he needs a serious reality check.

Car-free D.C. in your future?

Cyclists require no licensing to demonstrate knowledge road rules, carry no insurance, pay no gasoline tax to fund upkeep, and carry no visible vehicle identification. If a cyclists pops from the curb into oncoming traffic (quite commonly happens), a driver may have to make a split second decision between hitting the cyclist or the car in the next lane. In the latter scenario, the cyclist can pedal away unidentified and bear no liability. Nonetheless, DC has elevated cyclists to having the same privileges of the road as motorists.

Mandatory car-free day would effectively become work-from-home day for many. As for me, I can't take Metro every day, and it becomes I-can't-get-to-class day since I leave work for night school in Montgomery County some days.

Don't get me wrong. I like the bike lanes and use them regularly myself. However, Harry Jaffe should recognize that cyclists are getting a free ride and already have it pretty good.

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Let's hold up a mirror to the advocates of regulations

The Washington Examiner recently ran the following articles about regulation.

"What will Congress do to stop Obama's red tape explosion?"

"NARAL puts abortion profits ahead of women's safety"

Having friends and family who own and operate small businesses, I know their workload of complying with regulations frequently exceeds that of performing the work of their actual business. The regulations have such complexity that the same question to more than one regulator may get completely different answers, sometimes contradicting one another. Try to avoid pulling your hair out when you have to satisfy them all at once! Most Americans don't experience this first hand and hence don't have experience with this and how it compromises business growth, which of course has a tight correlation with job growth. So that Americans gain such a perspective, I propose the following. Before government regulators, such as employees of the EPA, collect each bi-weekly paycheck and vacation day, they must complete a maze of regulatory paperwork comparable to that which they impose upon domestic industry. Shall we extend this to recipients of entitlement spending while we're at it? If this happens, excessive regulation will shrink. NARAL is protesting Virginia requiring abortion clinics to meet medical standards. If they are throwing a temper tantrum about this, then I think we know what they really think about regulations.

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Keeping social security promises will require large scale sacrifice

On July 7, the Heritage Foundation published a charticle that plots defense spending versus entitlement spending against the past ~50 years.


http://www.heritage.org/budgetchartbook/defense-entitlement-spending

On September 12, CNS news reported the ratio of 1.75 people working full time jobs in the private sector for every 1 person collecting social security,

Labor Dept. Data: Only 1.75 Full-Time Private Sector Workers Per Social Security Recipient

...and with the Baby Boomer generation soon to retire, this ratio is going to get worse. To sustain social security for the current
retirees and the Baby Boomers, politicians will have to develop a strong spine to make some very tough decisions. For that to happen, voters and taxpaying citizens must do the same. We refer to the WWII generation as the Greatest Generation for all the sacrifices they made so that we could live in the country we have today. As a member of Generation X, I propose a far lesser sacrifice: pay into social security during our working lives until every last person 55 years or older receives every social security benefit promised to them by the US government. But after that, social security, at the federal level,
must end and never exist again.

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Power plant shutdown portends future energy rationing

The Washington Examiner recently ran articles about shutting down a power plan in Alexandria due to environmentalist concerns as well as an article about low satisfaction with Pepco.

http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/capital-land/2011/08/alexandria-power-plant-shut-down

http://washingtonexaminer.com/local/2011/07/satisfaction-pepco-plunges

Environmental extremists hale the announcement of the closing of the Potomac River Generating Station. Meanwhile, consumers award Pepco with a score of 54 on a scale of 1-100, and Business Insider declares Pepco the, "most hated," company in America. The low rating comes from repeated outages during adverse weather conditions leaving without power for a few hours or even days. If these extremists continue to have their way with coal fired power plants, energy rationing lurks just around the corner. If that happens, energy customers will yearn for the days when they complained about outages lasting for hours or days. In its place policy makers will institute peak usage surcharge rates and regularly scheduled blackouts. Don't be surprised if brownouts become commonplace too. The extremists cite asthma as a primary reason for the advocating this plant's closure. Take it from somebody with asthma, the extremists' successful efforts to replace my albuterol inhaler with the, "more ozone friendly," less effective version show how much they truly care about people with asthma. Alexandria mayor Bill Euille calls this great news. Why doesn't he put actions to words and sever every power line to his personal home until a new plant generates what the closing power plant won't?

Monday, September 5, 2011

Environmental Extremists should bear the same anger of Pepco's customer service

On 8/30/2011 the DC Examiner ran this story about a power plant closing in Alexandria, VA: Alexandria power plant to shut down

On 7/11/2011 the DC Examiner ran this story about Pepco's customer satisfaction sinking to 16 year lows: Satisfaction with Pepco plunges

Environmental extremists hale the announcement of the closing of the Potomac River Generating Station as reported by the Examiner on 8/31. Meanwhile, consumers award Pepco with a score of 54 on a scale of 1-100, and Business Insider declares Pepco the, "most hated," company in America. The low rating comes from none other than repeated outages during adverse weather conditions that leave customers without power for a few hours or even a few days. If these extremists continue to have their way with coal fired power plants, energy rationing is just around the corner. And if that happens, energy customers will yearn for the days when they complained about outages lasting for hours or days. In its place policy makers will institute peak usage surcharge rates and regularly scheduled blackouts. Don't be surprised if brownouts become commonplace too. The extremists cite asthma as a primary reason for the advocating the plant's closure. Take it from somebody with asthma, the extremists successful efforts to replace my effective albuterol inhaler with the, "more ozone friendly," version have done far more harm to me than the Potomac River Generating Station. Alexandria mayor Bill Euille calls this great news. Why doesn't he put actions to words and sever every power line to his personal home until a new plant generates what the closing power plant won't?